Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Adam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Nathan Adam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:BIO, an article about someone who writes for two non-notable blogs. Whilst there is a source from TechCrunch, I would cast that off as "over-hyped" as it merely seems to say that "a kid created a website". Greg Tyler (t &bull; c) 09:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * TechCrunch still wrote about it though, and it did not say that at all. It satisfies guidelines by linking to a news article. You can't dismiss that just because of your interpretation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twitterboy (talk • contribs) 22:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * My point is this: a single article about you saying that you "created a website" does not make you notable. Find me criteria on WP:BIO that make Nathan Adam notable. No awards or honours; no recognised and sustainable contributions; no new concepts; not cited by peers; the list goes on. I see no argument for keep. Greg Tyler (t &bull; c) 10:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, all indications seem to be at this point that he doesn't yet meet WP:BIO. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.