Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Blissett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:06, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Nathan Blissett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Per GNG TheMagikCow (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC) Support Found some relevant BBC sources that satisfy the GNG. TheMagikCow (talk) 15:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Might be an idea to add them to the article so that others can assess them........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Userfy - already established member of the team. Better to userfy in this instance as he has actually played for the club. Interested to see what BBC GNG sources are available. Fenix down (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 00:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, or possibly userfy. Currently does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL. However, as an established squad member at what is now a Football League club he will surely meet the notability guidelines soon, and the article can be restored when the time comes. &mdash; Gasheadsteve Talk to me 07:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG with, , . Nfitz (talk) 06:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Two local newspaper reports, one restricted to only Bristol plus a few brief comments from the player on signing a contract don't really amount to GNG. Fenix down (talk) 07:30, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Two different REGIONAL daily regional papers, both with significant paid circulation. These aren't weekly advertising papers. That's good enough for WP:GNG which has nothing that requires that the sources be national - a concept that doesn't exist in many countries. See WP:ITSLOCAL. Nfitz (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG as Bristol Rovers are currently in the Conference. Coverage is run-of-the mill for a footballer, fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 00:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY JMHamo (talk) 15:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.