Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Cochrane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Nathan Cochrane

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Journalist who fails WP:JOURNALIST. Article is unsourced and appears promotional in nature. Cjhard (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cjhard (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. In my WP:BEFORE, I found nothing significant about this bio. This one is well-detailed though, but there nothing else to pass WP:GNG. I would lean delete. 167.98.47.71 (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Thin sourcing. Fails GNG. LondonIP (talk) 19:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.