Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Eccleston (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Nathan Eccleston
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ATH Steve-Ho (talk) 06:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Spiderone  12:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete- Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG Spiderone  12:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - player fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Recreate if & when he meets any of these concerns in future. GiantSnowman 13:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nearly said "speedy delete G4", but the last paragraph is new so that probably doesn't apply. Nonetheless, he fails both policies Snowman cites.  Chances are he's only been added to the Champions League squad to satisfy the UEFA requirement for a minimum number of home-grown players or whatever it is, and has no chance of actually being selected to play. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ATH as he has not played at a fully-professional level. Also fails WP:GNG due to no significant third party coverage. Recreate if and when he makes his debut in a pro competition. --Jimbo[online] 19:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete clear fail, is this not a case for speedy delete as a recreation? Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 00:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. GauchoDude (talk) 03:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.