Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Floyd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Nathan Floyd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial, significant support. "References" are mostly unrelated to individual or are minor in nature. Advertising page created by related party. red dogsix (talk) 04:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  08:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 15.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not seeing any real claim to significance here.  What I am seeing is an article that has been padded with lengthy digressions into the histories and backgrounds of people and organizations that had any connection to the subject.  When you disregard those digressions, there really isn't very much being said about the subject.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.