Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Gale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dimebag Darrell. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Nathan Gale

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails notability per WP:EVENT. Delete, or rename or merge into Dimebag Darrell Fasttimes68 (talk) 14:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO1E, then redirect to the Abbott article. Gale himself was a very non-notable person and his "fame" relies solely on the fact that he murdered a person of mid-level notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

--Bongwarrior (talk) 21:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per Niteshift36. Dimebag Darrell was notable but not, in my judgment, enougb of a celebrity that we ought to have a separate biography of his murderer. See WP:PERP.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  20:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above. Just some random weirdo who had issues. I was a fan of Dimebag and the crime was terrible, but his murderer doesn't have the notoriety of, say, Mark David Chapman or Sirhan Sirhan. I was a bit surprised to see that this was a blue link, and reassured to see that it had already been nommed when I clicked on it. No objections to a redirect.
 * Neutral - on one hand, the murder seems to be significant and has coverage by multiple reliable sources. On the other...it does not seem to be very notable. But I'm leaning "Keep" at the moment. Cyan  Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 02:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.