Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan L. Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  00:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Nathan L. Johnson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable individual. No GHits of substance and no GNEWS. CSD removed by unregistered SPA user. Fails WP:BIO. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:59, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER. Location (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:Notability among others Jamesofur (talk) 06:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:Notability. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 08:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per all previous comments. McMarcoP (talk) 09:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:BIO RadioFan (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, vanity page. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article asserts that he is an actor, yet all of his roles, it seems, are as an extra. References provided are way too vague to be of any use. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, noteworthy personality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.17.66.102 (talk) 21:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)  — 64.17.66.102 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Could you please explain why? McMarcoP (talk) 08:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets criteria in a number of ways for WP:Notability]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.168.127.211 (talk) 02:53, 13 August 2009 (UTC)  — 75.168.127.211 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Can you please be more specific? --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 03:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Comment - He meets the criteria of WP:Notability because of all he's done in the realm of arts, writing, acting, blogging and his city involvement.  He appears to be the only sports journalist in Pine City from looking at the reference.  He started the city's first blog.  The city he plans for is award-winning (See Pine City, Minnesota).  He has a colorful tv, film and theater background as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.17.66.102 (talk) 16:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)  — 64.17.66.102 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment - I still see nothing that satisfies the Basic or Additional criteria sections of notability. Can you please specifically address those sections.   ttonyb1  (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Many of these claims are hand-waving. I'm not sure how creating the city's 'blog would be notable.  And being associated with something “notable” does not itself confer “notability”; if Mr Johnson won a significant award for his planning, that would be one thing; to plan for a city that won some award is far less. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 05:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.