Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Lowell (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Barely, per the so far uncontested sources by Fixuture. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Nathan Lowell
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Searches are not finding the needed information and sourcing for independent notability and substance and this was also deleted in 2010, which says a lot by itself, WorldCat and my own searches are not finding convincingly better. SwisterTwister  talk  19:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:23, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:36, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * So are the Parsec Awards sufficiently major that winning them sufficiently demonstrates notability? I am unsure; they seem like a lot of categories for a niche market, much like certain recently discussed adult entertainment awards. Jclemens (talk) 18:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - these 2 sources indicate notability: &  as well as  - however an article about the "Tales from the Golden Age of the Solar Clipper" might be better than one about the author. --Fixuture (talk) 19:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete promotional articles on a non-notable science fiction writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.