Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Moon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, the "top professional league" indicates indeed NHL or KHL--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Nathan Moon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 04:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As nom mentions, fails WP:NHOCKEY. While he was a fourth-round draft pick in the NHL, he was never signed and has bounced around the ECHL since. Hasn't been the recipient of any notable honors or awards, and fails WP:GNG otherwise. ERK  talk 13:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Forgive the newbie question, but one of the guidelines I see on WP:NHOCKEY is "Played one or more games in an existing or defunct top professional league". This player has played in quite a few AHL and ECHL games. Doesn't that satisfy this criteria? Or does the fact that the guidelines says 'top professional league' indicate that it has to be a league like the NHL or KHL? Also, for what it's worth, this person did win the Central Hockey League championship back in the 2010-11 season (source from Elite Prospects). --My Pants Metal (talk) 16:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Playing on a successful minor league team does not show notability. Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG since coverage is not significant and independent.Mdtemp (talk) 17:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.