Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Thoms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per lack of reliable sources or other clear indication of notability. Tikiwont (talk) 10:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Nathan Thoms

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Author with one self-published book based on own thesis. Likely autobio. Speedy declined. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 09:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete His book doesn't appear to be self-published actually (it made it on Amazon under a publisher), but with the current sources, he still appears to be a blogger/movie reviewer with no notability. I can't find anything on google to suggest that he's been in the media. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 12:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Lulu.com is a vanity press that distributes through Amazon, Barnes & Noble, etc. It's very good, actually, but still counts as self-publishing. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 01:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The book is in fact self-published, as DC points out. There is nothing else by way of sources to suggest subject passes standard of WP:BIO.  Darkspots (talk) 12:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.