Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Wilkes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Nathan Wilkes

 * – ( View AfD View log )

15-year-old film-maker who doesn't appear to be notable. Only one of the three sources is allegedly about him, and that claims to have been published in 1997, when the subject would've been two years old. Prod removed. Black Kite (t) (c) 13:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — —Tom Morris (talk) 14:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nominator. Edward321 (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - While there might be a successful AfD defense made for the hemophilia activist of the same name, this young aspiring moviemaker is not the subject of substantial coverage in multiple independent sources and clearly does not rise to the General Notability benchmarks. I do wish him all the best with his various projects and hope that he has a successful career. Carrite (talk) 16:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I find the entire article hard to believe, and the references aren't about the subject. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with MikeWazowski, the sources are unreliable, (Facebook,Yahoo Answers,IMDB,etc.) Mayhem  Mario  19:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - References are not about the subject. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 02:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete references are odd. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – Simply fails GNG. There might be a possibility that author and subject of the article are both same (promotional).  undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   03:30, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.