Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Adam Briggs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Nathaniel Adam Briggs

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Sole contributor removed CSD tags multiple times. After article was CSD'd, contributor wished deletion to be reviewed by the community instead. Non-notable person involved in non-notable business ventures. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 20:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not enough to meet WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Appears not to meet notability standards, as NawlinWiki says. --Pstanton (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Removed the CSD tags as I thought I was supposed to. I'm new here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesignerHuman (talk • contribs) 15:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)  — DesignerHuman (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep, SeniorsGrandCentral, a business venture is quite notable to many people over the age of 55 across the globe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesignerHuman (talk • contribs) 15:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)  — DesignerHuman (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Additionally, the fellow has made significant contributions to the computer graphics professional community, and has been widely known for such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesignerHuman (talk • contribs) 15:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)  — DesignerHuman (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * There's no need to vote more than once. I went ahead and bolded your first keep though, so it's more evident, and formatted your comments. I hope you don't mind. ^_^ Silver  seren C 21:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 21:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 21:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't understand why you guys are saying that it doesn't meet notability standards, per WP:BIO. There is a significant amount of coverage in the sources that establish notability. Silver  seren C 21:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The fellow seems notable enough from what I'm reading and the editor who created the page did note when he created it that the article was not ready for review yet.  Millahnna (mouse)  talk  21:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

additional comments, and relative data are available in the discussion segment of the page -- also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Merz_Nordstrom is/was a writer for eGenerations as her "LifeLong" column on eGenerations still is live http://egenerations.com/lifelong-articles - hope that helps

Also, there is additional data available on Vator.tv here >> http://vator.tv/company/online-community-because-experience-never-gets-old-egenerations —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesignerHuman (talk • contribs) 21:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)  — DesignerHuman (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

thanks btw to those assisting me as I learn wikipedia. i'm not intentionally trying to do the incorrect things (vote twice, etc) - so thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesignerHuman (talk • contribs) 22:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)  — DesignerHuman (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete Sorry, not notable - which means, not recognized or written about by independent reliable sources (see WP:N and WP:RS). Looking at the references in the article: one, the only detailed one, is from a less-than-one-year-old quarterly supplement to a small regional newspaper; one is actually an op-ed or letter to the editor written BY the subject; and one is a blog article which describes the subject's efforts to land a job as a CIO. (If he is such a notable tycoon, why is he trolling for a job as a CIO? And is he hoping to point to this Wikipedia article to support his job search?) As for Vator it's a directory-type listing, presumably self-supplied. Not a single WP:Reliable source among them. --MelanieN (talk) 03:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Just some notes - Another point of view could be that he's a pioneering CIO (the highest seat available in IT), and that video resumes are the future. One could consider leading-edge notable.
 * See Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --MelanieN (talk) 15:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see notability. 'DesignerHuman' talks about the notability of the ?SeniorsCentral? organization - but that's not what this article is about.  David V Houston (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

So why is that this sat with a majority of KEEPs in limbo, and as soon as DELETEs hit 1 in the majority, it gets deleted. Things seem really bias here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesignerHuman (talk • contribs) 00:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

BS fiefdoms - apparently the read on Wiki editors is correct - this is BS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesignerHuman (talk • contribs) 05:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)