Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

For the last 6 years attempts have been made to clean up this article and give the opportunity for the author to prove the notability of this planning consultancy. Instead the advert-like material has simply been added back. Though I'm tempted to try and speedy delete it as a promotional piece, the company's involvement in major projects over 50 years made it more sensible to AfD it. Planning consultancies play an important role, but not a high profile one in construction projects. I somehow doubt they've been the subject of any major coverage, outside of industry-specific planning journals. Narrow interest journals won't in themselves meet WP:NCORP criteria. Sionk (talk) 13:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article's references are brief announcements of projects and I'm not seeing any of the significant coverage that we look for when assessing notability.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is far too promotional and chatty to be an article, even if the firm was notable. We are not a web host. Bearian (talk) 17:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.