Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Wedderburn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 11:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Nathaniel Wedderburn

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nathaniel Wedderburn has not played a game of fully professional football and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.   —Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 06:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BIO WP:ATHLETE, H2H (talk) 07:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Jimbo[online] 09:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep . Clearly part of Stoke's first team, as per media references. Season starts on Saturday, seems WP:POINT to be nominating a first-team player for deletion 5 days before the start of the season! Nfitz (talk) 18:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Wedderburn is a 17 year old who was released by Wolves. The fact he has featured a bit in pre-season doesn't mean he will be anywhere near Stoke's first team in the league season. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: He was released by the Wolves when he was 14! Let's see if he's anywhere on the bench on Saturday before we start deleting the article, given recent media coverage. Nfitz (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * He hasn't been given a squad number by Stoke. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Good catch! I'll withdraw my keep. Nfitz (talk) 22:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.