Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Agents Alliance (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

National Agents Alliance
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private business. Significant RS coverage not found. What's listed in the article does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH & WP:AUD. Has been previously deleted at AfD in 2011 and then recreated by a SPA account: Special:Contributions/LivingLegend2. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:42, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:42, 11 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt: An article describing an insurance intermediary firm, recreated by a WP:SPA 10 days after the previous AfD deletion (also after a Request for Undeletion by another WP:SPA account had been declined). As the nomination says, the coverage provided is routine and I am not anything to indicate more than a run-of-the-mill company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt: Per AllyD; this appears to be enough of a sock-magnet that its continued existence is purely disruptive at this point. &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  10:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt: Per AllyD above. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 12:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.