Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Array for the Abatement of Drugs and Underage Consumption


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedied G1. Tawker 05:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

National Array for the Abatement of Drugs and Underage Consumption
Original research, if not patent nonsense. Stormie 01:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Delete Looks bogus, unencyclopedic.-- The  i  kiro  id  (talk) (Help Me Improve) 01:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Probably a bogus organization, 0 Google hits.  SCH ZMO  ✍ 01:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could almost have been speedied as nonsense. Kevin 01:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Metamagician3000 01:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Also looked up the address, and it seems to be a personal address. TheProject 01:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. -- MarcoTolo 01:43, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete same as NAADUC above. ~Kylu ( u | t )  02:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable conspiracy theory. See discussion with author on her talk page. Fan1967 02:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete just like NAADUC; can i be any more obvious? it's obviously the same M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete nonsense, google turns up nothing, Ms. Edwards works for the Crimson Flacon Press? Good grief. BigDT 04:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy if possible. -- ReyBrujo 04:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, for the love of Pete! Per speedy deletion of NAADUC above. Hoax or patent nonsense, one of the two. --AbsolutDan (talk) 05:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.