Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Audit Project 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:12, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

National Audit Project 3

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article about a Britisch study into the use of central neuraxial blockading. No indication of notability or importance. Current contents is a primarily sourced summary of the study. No reliable sources evident on Google/GNews (other than the British Journal of Anaesthesia, but I think that's a primary source in this case). Note that I could live with a merger to an appropriate article, but I cannot determine which that would be. BenTels (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, add nominal information to Royal College of Anaesthetists. There are other NAPs (NAP4 was about difficult airway management, and NAP5 will place emphasis on anaesthesia awareness). JFW &#124; T@lk  23:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough for a stand alone article. SalHamton (talk) 18:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.