Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Ayurvedic Medical Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

National Ayurvedic Medical Association

 * – ( View AfD View log )

An alt medicine organisation, with no remarkable achievement or coverage to merit an article on Wikipedia. Lacks significant coverage in third party media. The AMA journal article has a single passing mention. The sourcing does not rise to the standard set by WP:ORGCRIT. In addition, due to the nature of the organization, WP:FRINGE and WP:MEDRS are relevant, so there need to be strong sources than what is available to allow articles on this topic. Created by a possible WP:COI user. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Also to say, the username of the user who created the page was called Joshgreene and the article is also promotional. Fails WP:NCOMPANY and WP:GNG obviously as well.– Cupper 52 Discuss! 18:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nomination and the fact that the original version is basically the same as their website's "About" page. It's possible in principle that that was a reverse copyvio, but let's not kid ourselves. Obvious advertisement is obvious. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.