Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Coalition for Homeless Veterans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  07:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

National Coalition for Homeless Veterans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-remarkable organization. Going to summits is what these organizations do as part of their routine business and article is built off of these primary sources (their own, as well as relevant summit pages). After trimming out things that were not relevant, what's left is based on primary source. I don't believe there are sources that can establish this organization to WP:NORG level. Graywalls (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Trying to find sources that show direct WP:SIGCOV is like trying to find a needle in a pile of needles. I gave up after ten pages of wading, as they are referenced for statistics and comments in hundreds of articles that they aren't the direct subject of. However, their quotes and statistics being regularly used and the fact that C-SPAN has on multiple occassions covered their yearly conference leads me to believe that someone with more patience or better googling skills could come up with a few good sources. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks for your comment. I checked it out. The role of the organization is a host, as it says in the videos "HOSTING ORGANIZATION National Coalition for Homeless Veterans". This doesn't satisfy the high standards of WP:NCORP. C-SPAN is not discussing or making extensive analysis of the NCHV's speech or the organization and you didn't supplement it with a policy suggesting this sort of coverage would qualify and until then, I'm convinced this should be deleted. If a needle can get lost in a pile of needle, it's just a needle. It's not a distinctively unique and notable needle in a sea of needles. Graywalls (talk) 16:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep per Sulfurboy Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 12:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sulfurboy. Seems reasonable to keep the article based on that. Dwaro (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I have searched for references and like Sulfurboy, I agree that not a single reference that meets the criteria for establishing notability can be found. Unlike Sulfurboy though, that's a clear and simple reason to Delete for me. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.