Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Commission for Justice and Peace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

National Commission for Justice and Peace

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing in coverage to pass tough WP:ORG criteria. Störm  (talk)  15:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Notable enough per coverage .  Mar4d  ( talk ) 07:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep -- As a Christian campaigning organisation operating in an environment hostile, it ought to be notable. However, I wonder whether it should not be called National Commission for Justice and Peace (Pakistan) to make its scope clearer.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * delete the article lacks the depth of source coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 03:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be doing some high profile important work of national importance, including winning an International peace award. I will look for some more articles when I get a chance, I;'m sure there is more than this about. Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep looks notable.  samee  talk 14:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep there are multiple reliable sources in the article Atlantic306 (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.