Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Crownie Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

National Crownie Day

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Non-notable promotional event. Ridernyc (talk) 10:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possible hoax, as barely any web hits exist to allow verification; at best promotional event receiving apparently no news coverage at all, and thus failing notability guidelines. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable even if true, and if was sourced. (Besides it's National Delete Day.) Steve Dufour (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, reality is not enough, you need significant coverage in reliable sources see WP:GNG Polarpanda (talk) 11:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, I know this is contested, but it's so clearly non-notable brand promotion that I don't see the point of waiting for a consensus to appear. --Slashme (talk) 11:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This is one of those times when it's obvious this article should be deleted but it fails to fit into any category for speedy. I also strongly oppose early closures unless there is obvious bad faith, just let the debate run it's course. Ridernyc (talk) 11:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep The website has only been just set up. The event has been running for 4 years. A google search of "national crownie day" will provide as the first entry ;


 * http://dwarkarn.com/simplemachinesforum/


 * Which is the URL for our forums.


 * Please do not delete this wikipedia entry, it is a celebration, it has a website and forums, and while it might be insignificant to people who do not partake in the event, it is a real event that people attend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwarkarn (talk • contribs) 11:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable.  7107delicious  Weinachtsgespräch 11:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Bottom Line. Real Event. Real Website. Real Beer. Happens every year as evidenced by the past 4 years. This is not vandalism it is a real event, thus should not be deleted.

Once again I say that plenty of other events were marked for deletion years ago that turned out to be significant events. You are all being a bit speedy ninja trying to get this deleted. It is not offensive in any form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwarkarn (talk • contribs) 12:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:N, events need to be notable, end of story. Ridernyc (talk) 12:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

I dont understand how this falls under brand "promotion" since Crown Lager is already a well established brand that I have no affiliation with. If you are trying to delete "non notable events" then maybe you should look at Bed_Time and direct your energy to there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwarkarn (talk • contribs) 12:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Isn't that argument just Other stuff exists? If you don't think that that song is notable, that doesn't make Crownie Day notable. --Slashme (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm sure that this can be mentioned in the advertisement that masquerades as a Wikipedia article called Crown Lager. Bottom line- real event, real website, real beer, real advertising.  Mandsford (talk) 17:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, NOT because it's a beer promotion (we have an article on Spuds MacKenzie after all) but because it's completely and utterly non-notable. The forum linked above has all of THREE members total, at least one of which is whoever started the forum. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Simply a non-notable event. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.