Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Day of Slayer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was the article to go for deletion, do not merge, do not redirect.,. Mailer Diablo 08:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

National Day of Slayer
Keep this page. See related AfD. TheProject 03:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Most of it is copyvio anyway, although I suppose you could make a case for fair use; cruft in any case Hobbeslover | (talk) (contribs) 03:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fancruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- fancruft. - Longhair 04:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * In honour of the National Day of Slayer, I vote that we delete an unencyclopedic article. This looks like a prime candidate. Delete. Capitalistroadster 07:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * In that case, I timed this AfD a few days too early... :-) TheProject 07:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 *  Merge should this just be merged with the slayer article? --Kev62nesl 07:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with the Slayer article, if this day actually has anything to do with the band. J Milburn 12:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fancruft. --Ter e nce Ong 14:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no merge or redirect The article is just an advertisement for a web site. The article does not even state that this thing is endorsed by Slayer- or that Slayer has even heard of it. The article is POV nonsense, and it's spam. -- Kicking222 17:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the day has nothing to do with the band. J Milburn 22:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, another article advocating this was quickly deleted above. This one deserves the same fate. Non-notable holiday. Grand  master  ka  01:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic fancruft.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  06:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.