Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Development Initiatives Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

National Development Initiatives Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Despite the Web site's claims, this does not seem to be a real organization at all. No Chinese Wikipedia article. More suspiciously, both the English and the Chinese Web site contain very little actual information. I am not convinced that this is a real school, and even if it is, I am not sure I see its notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions.  -- Acather96 (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- Acather96 (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 02:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Their English language website seems to be http://www.get.org.tw/ndi/e_ndi/index.htm which does have a lot of info. They get a mention a a Taiwanese government site here and on the website of the Brazilian representative office (the de facto embassy) here which indicates that this school is genuine. As higher education institution are usually considered notable, we should probably keep this one as well. Travelbird (talk) 08:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.