Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Episcopal Historians and Archivists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ST47 (talk) 01:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

National Episcopal Historians and Archivists

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One of multiple Episcopalian historical societies, fails WP:NORG.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 21:33, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 21:33, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 21:33, 16 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep As annoying as it is to have multiple redundant organizations, this article is useful in that they publish "The Historiographer". In the case of "The Historiographer", having this article allows readers to more easily determine the source of the journal (in articles such as Henry Benjamin Whipple), and to distinguish it from Historiographer Royal. This organization is a cited publisher on several EC-USA pages: All Saints Episcopal Church, Waveland (Jensen Beach, Florida) and Christ Episcopal Church (Monticello, Florida).--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 03:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep -- It is useful to have articles on learned societies, though it is difficult to find external reliable sources on them. This particularly applies when they publish an academic journal.  In this case, The Historiographer is only described as a newsletter, which is why I only say weak keep.  Nevertheless, it is worth having an article on the denominational history society of a major denomination.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as there are reliable book sources and it does have a scholarly significance in preserving church history Atlantic306 (talk) 20:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.