Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Freight Index in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

National Freight Index in India

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sources are not good enough. Fails GNG  Jen yir e2  06:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  Jen yir e2  06:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 11:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The name sounds as if it should be notable, but it is actually a non-notable index of a start-up company’s own trading platform. "The NFI is based on real transactions taking place on Rivigo Freight marketplace". Fails WP:NCORP. SailingInABathTub (talk) 08:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Web searching does not reveal enough coverage to satisfy WP:NCORP and they seem to revolve around the establishment of the subject only. Considering that the parent company Rivigo is salted, it is even more unlikely for a part of the company's operation to be notable. The words seems slightly promotional, though I would not accuse the creator of WP:COI yet out of WP:AGF. ~  Ase1este charge-paritytime 10:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, SailingInABathTub does a good summary above, fails NCORP.  HighKing++ 21:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * delete: per SailingInABathTub, and Aseleste. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.