Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:WDAFD: Withdrawn by nom.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

National High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

FR&thinsp;+ 10:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  11:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  11:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - a couple of suitable sources 1) A school with a national flavour 2) Governor opens National High School's new annexe building. Both satisfy SigCov and would seem to satisfy the other grounds. Whatever your personal views are on the high school existence/notability grounds this certainly satisfies requirements. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * -Both are from the same publishing house so it effectively amounts to only one reliable source. — FR&thinsp;+ 12:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * , since schools primarily operate under WP:GNG, rather than the stricter WP:NORG requirements, multiple sources is merely preferable rather than obligatory. However, in request for another source: National High Schools turn 100 Nosebagbear (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * -Well, You have convinced me that the article is notable. I have effectively withdrawn this nomination. — FR&thinsp;+ 07:04, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep but WP:TNT for irrelevant sections like the school prayer lyrics, list of governing body / board members with honorifics, and specific addresses down to the zip code. The two news articles are decent significant coverage, especially "A school with a national flavour" But it needs a scrubbing of peacock statements like "The NHS Boys school in the early eighties had a very vibrant double MA in English Head Master M P S Nair. Students fondly recall him. Even the academically bad students gave excellent results under him." written like ads. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 13:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not really TNT if you only want to remove sections - there is no way the article needs blanking. It certainly has irrelevant bits and promo bits but I think I'd struggle to claim it didn't have anything worthwhile/it was easier to obliterate and start from scratch. That said, clearly cleanup is needed. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I've removed those sections for now. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I've returned about 1/4 of what you removed. I'm not sure about a small portion of the rest but I agree it was probably most efficient to expunge and then replace what might be relevant afterwards. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.