Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Indian Gaming Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  06:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

National Indian Gaming Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCOMPANY and WP:GNG. Masum Reza 📞 22:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Masum Reza 📞  22:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Masum Reza 📞  22:44, 23 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Is the main lobbying group for Native American gaming in Washington, so likely an important group, but not enough information to really be its own article as-is without expansion/rescue. A merge of this content to a section in Native American gaming should be considered, with the title redirected into it.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm. You are right. Masum Reza 📞 00:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable, but I am unsure if it is the best option. Geolodus (talk) 13:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Here are some links to show notability On the last page here you can see the chairman and the treasurer --> http://www.indiangaming.com/istore/Mar18_2018%20London.pdf More links about activities http://www.gamingmeets.com/event/niga-indian-gaming-2019-tradeshow-and-convention/ https://www.indiangamingtradeshow.com/dsn/wwwurbanexposhowscom/Content/Documents/IndianGaming/Indian%20Gaming%202014%20_Culture%20Night%20Reception%20Release.pdf https://www.fantiniresearch.com/conventions/niga-national-indian-gaming-association-2019-trade-show-convention.html Caribianboss (talk) 00:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I have added references in the article, The National Indian Gaming Association is not for profit, so this is not an advertisement in any way. It participates in conventions and cares for the Native American community.


 * I added more content to the page and various external sources to support notability of the National Indian Gaming Association Caribianboss (talk) 05:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

@Masumrezarock100 I believe that at this stage the article is very well referenced and consequently i think it would be prudent for the deleteion proposal to be weived. Caribianboss (talk) 04:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added a handful of s, plenty of more where they came from, 600+ mentions in Scholar, no shortage of news coverage. Meets GNG by a mile. On a side note, this discussion should not have been sorted into "list of India-related deletion discussions". Sam Sailor 21:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I did that because it has "Indian" word in his title. Masum Reza 📞 21:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "Indian" referes to Native americans (the so-called "red indians" and not to the asiatic people who live in the famous subcontinent. Caribianboss (talk) 03:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. Looks like I have a lot to learn. Masum Reza 📞 05:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It should not have been sorted into Companies either. I have removed the transclusion on both WikiProject Deletion sorting/India and WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies and added the discussion to the two lists below. Sam Sailor 05:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 05:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 05:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Sailor Sailor seems to have added many good sources, so it is a case of HEY.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The refs are OK. Szzuk (talk) 20:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.