Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Orgasm Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  02:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

National Orgasm Day

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe that "National Orgasm Day" is a widespread enough observance to warrant a Wikipedia article. If it were a common or popular observance, why is there only one source to verify a one-liner article? Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 02:40, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment page was never transcluded at AFD. Primefac (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It is a non-article and should be removed. -Sb2001 (talk) 00:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - Terrible stub but it seems there is a significant Google footprint for this day and event. Carrite (talk) 13:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, there does seem to be enough Gnews coverage -- and not all from the same year. Keep per GNG. Even this placerholder-ish stub is better than nothing. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm surprised to be saying this as this sub-stub has nearly no useful information but: There is significant coverage in independent WP:RS and so it passes WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep As above. There is little information on the page. However, there is a *lot* of articles discussing it from standard RS. I've added a number of them to the article. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.