Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Petroleum Technology Office

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. The article is now unrelated to that which was nominated. -Splash 22:58, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

National Petroleum Technology Office
VfD not previously listed - no vote --Doc (?) 19:06, 3 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Claims to give information on the topic: "Global Information". Seems to be advertising a company. Written in 1st person, so non-encyclopediac. Contact details at bottom of the page suggest a greater possibility of promoting a product or company. Google does a good translation if anyone needs one (German to English). -- FireFox 20:35, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * This VfD still seems to be live, so I will add my delete to that of FireFox. Physchim62 01:10, 26 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. en.wiki is not de.wiki.  Dlyons493 19:32, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Transfer from Pages needing translation into English:
 * German. Looks like spam to me, but I can't tell.  -- Creidieki 13:37, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Erm... Difficult one, contains some info but contains contact info, so who knows...FireFox 13:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Taken another look at this one. The article seems to be advertising a product or system and is written in the first person. FireFox 20:27, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The article is currently undergoing a VfD proccess. --Sn0wflake 02:21, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep and redirect if it is translated into English. The National Petroleum Technology Office is/was a real U.S. Gov't agency under the Department of Energy; its name has since been changed to the Strategic Center for Natural Gas and Oil.  I'm all for deleting government departments, but so long as they exist, many of them will warrant WP articles. Paul 21:31, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The article does not talk about a US gov't agnecy, but I agree with a redirect if the title permits it. Physchim62 23:06, 4 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment I don't know what the stuff in German was, but I wrote a stub about the actual agency by this name.  Paul 02:32, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks like that does the job nicely! Thanks. Physchim62 02:41, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.