Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Positions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

National Positions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable SEO company. Fails WP:NCORP. Unreliable, WP:REFBOMBed sources. Some are deceptive too, such the first citation which looks like a HuffPost article but it's actually a HuffPost Contributers site, basically a blog (see listing below WP:HUFFPOST. Other citations are listings of hundreds of companies, etc. TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 07:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom, lots of references in the article but none are of the quality required. I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 17:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.