Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Socialist American Labor Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

National Socialist American Labor Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non-notable party, weblink points nowhere Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 18:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Other than a passing mention as a hate group, there's nothing about them. According to their blog, you may need a proxy to access their website because "Some internet providers sensor [sic] us."  -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable fascist party, fails WP:GNG. Claritas § 18:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I fixed the link, so it now points to their website. They claim they aren't a hate group, but have a Nazi symbol in their official logo.  Odd.  Anyway, only one news mention found so far.   D r e a m Focus  19:57, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Because the Southern Poverty Law Center is the organization that keeps track of notable hate groups, and they list them as being active in a dozen states. They don't mention you unless you are a significant hate group.   D r e a m Focus  20:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete fails notability as a hate group or as political party. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 04:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- only sources other than the group's own website are literally just name drops. Reyk  YO!  07:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable hate group doesn't deserve the attention.   Snotty Wong   chatter 14:43, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The Southern Poverty Law Centre citation isn't enough coverage to support an article. Fails WP:GNG. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Retaining and expanding this article can help readers and editors of Wikipedia in disambiguating (in dating and nomenclature): the name itself (quite apart from the group it refers to) parallels yet stands distinct from the likes of the National Socialist Labor Party of Germany in America (1930s - ), the National Socialist Labor Party (fl. ca 1916 - ), the  National Socialist German Labor Party (1920-1945), the Socialist Labor Party of America (1877- ), etc. We could merge with (say) Neo-Nazism, but that might obscure any disambiguation. -- Pedant17 (talk) 02:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You're assuming there's a connection (between basic beliefs and a similar name, I'm not seeing any hint of one) and I don't think we have the adequate sources to make the connection. Do you know if the National Socialist Labor Party of 1916 is related to this National Socialist American Labor Party?  None of those sources you have listed discussed this group even remotely, so are you essentially suggesting retain the article in the hope that there are sources describing a connection between the one here and the ones we have sources for? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:26, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete There are inadequate sources to write an article. While the SPLC lists them as a hate group they do not provide any information about them.  TFD (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete trivial mention by SPLC. Not enough to WP:verifynotability. Can't create an article for every entry in some database since WP:NOTDIR. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for Rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.   Snotty Wong   talk 22:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.