Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Teachers Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

National Teachers Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG and was deleted earlier too Pridemanty (talk) 08:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability   O n m yw a y 22   talk 09:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not justified by the available references. Fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 10:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep This is an institution with over 4 decades of existence and has trained thousands of Tutors. Not having much mentioned in the online medium does not mean it is not notable in the country. A large portion of the population of teachers in Nigeria schooled at the National Institute of Teachers.Atibrarian (talk) 11:55, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. appropriate page for a government department, Does need addition sourcing. Perhaps draftify?  DGG ( talk ) 13:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Article of a notable Federal government of Nigeria owned institution. Passes WP:GNG as sources exist. — Nnadigoodluck  █ █ █ 11:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep : One of the oldest Federal government of Nigeria institutions that has been the subject of multiple independent reliable sources including journals, books, news etc. Just to mention a few of these sources, see this journal, this journal, this book, this paper. Offi gems (talk) 14:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep lots of sources exist -    .  Princess of Ara  05:26, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - as it passes GNG. Speedy keep is not available since there are delete !votes. Draftify would be an option, as the article is poorly done as it stands.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.