Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Youth Council of Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:35, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

National Youth Council of Canada
I was thinking of speedying this, but I'm not 100% sure that it doesn't exist. There is no National Youth Council of Canada AFAIK, and none of the ministers in the article show up on Google.--Shanel 21:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable. Appears to informal high school group. Atrian 22:46, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment. I got this email today:

To whom it may concern,

My name is Mackenzie Moreau and I currently stand as the Leader and Minister of Youth for the National Youth Council of Canada.

I was informed today, that this contact was making false assumptions towards the NYCC on www. wikipedia.org. Because of this I have been forced to contact you, and assure you of the council's standing at the present time.

I assure you, that the NYCC is not a fake, unreal council, but in fact a well known federal council that has received recognition from various amounts of federal, provincial and municipal politicians all commemorating us on our future ambitions and our past successions.

Please feel free to visit www.newsdurhamregion.com - search NYCC or Mackenzie Moreau, and that should provide you with reassurance.

Our council is a full fledged youth council, that represents youth on a federal basis, and I do not appreciate your behaviour towards the reality of our youth, and I would strongly suggest that for future reference complete all searches before making assumptions.

Thank You,

Mackenzie Moreau

p.s - we are to receive our completed website within the month or so!


 * Not that it will save this article from deletion (They only formed recently it seems), but at least we know it's not a hoax.--Shanel 19:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Atrian. Stifle 13:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm afraid. It might be notable, but I think a clean-slate might be better than what appears to be some sort of "articles of incorporation" or something like that. Dan 18:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, probably non-existent, yet. I didn't want to vote this way. I looked, and looked, and looked. I wanted to find some notability or credible source to proove this group's existence. No dice. Ifnord 20:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.