Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nationwide Teacher In-service Advancement Education Information Web


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Nationwide Teacher In-service Advancement Education Information Web

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Article is spam for a non-notable organization. TN X Man 12:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - as per nom. Codf1977 (talk) 14:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sure if this is about some kind of official program or what, really, but even if it has some kind of standing with the Taiwanese government and its education departments, the article should be about the program and not about a website.  Google searches find nothing, but perhaps a search in Chinese should be tried.  And while the article's English is vastly superior to my Chinese, it seems to contain large swatches of meaningless promotional gobbledygook: This service is to promote educational reform in Taiwan and to integrate the resources of in-service teacher advancement education effectively for fulfilling the idea of teachers’ life-long learning . - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy/strong delete - surely an A7? In any event fails GNG. ukexpat (talk) 21:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.