Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Native (OneRepublic album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 21:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Native (OneRepublic album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NMUSIC this album is not yet notable. It actually fails WP:GNG as it has not been the main subject of reliable sources. I would have just userfied but there isn't even enough information that is references from HQ sources to warrant userfying. Coverage is trivial or non-reliable and nothing that doesn't suffice from a mention on the group's page. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  23:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The page is currently being worked on and new references are being added. The album is getting more and more information released almost daily so it's pretty much a work in progress. User:Contactman7 —Preceding undated comment added 23:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment, twitter is not a reliable source and if that's the case it should be worked on in a WP:Sandbox not in the mainspace. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  23:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep or Incubate. The album is out in about 8 weeks, the artwork is out, the first single from the album is out, all reported in reliable sources such as Billboard and MTV. There are bound to be more sources for this within weeks, so deleting it seems pointless. --Michig (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment, Thank you. This is exactly what I think. If it does get deleted, someone is just gonna make it again because it's going to be released in a month. Deleting now seems pointless. --User:Contactman7 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:04, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per the fact that there is enough information for it to be on Wikipedia. 68.44.51.49 (talk) 22:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Though there is a touch of crystal-ballery about this, it seems silly to delete the article now with the release imminent. The coverage received by the single in major music sources can be used as an indicator that the album will also receive a similar level of coverage, so let's just WP:IAR and hang on to it for now. — sparklism hey! 11:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment, Exactly, Billboard released 3 articles covering the single and one about the album release. Jonthejerk (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.