Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Native science


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. In addition to the consensus to delete arising from this discussion, a substantial part of the article is a word-or-word copy of part of "Visions of a Native science: Appreciation of Gregory Cajete". So it will be deleted as a copyright infringement. --Tony Sidaway 20:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Native science

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Completion of incomplete AfD begun by User:99.231.89.235. Procedural... Personal opinion follows SkierRMH 00:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Article's core is on "philosophy", very little substance relative to article title; list of articles not incorporated into article. SkierRMH 00:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur, the article comes across as gibberish. BTW thanks for finishing the process, I couldn't do it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.89.235 (talk) 04:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks like POV and original research. If it's going to be kept, it needs much better references to support the dubious claims made in the article. Terraxos 18:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep It looks like it may be a notable topic (see, ). The article can be rewritten. --Alksub 00:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.