Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Mechanics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BJ Talk 19:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Natural Mechanics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is pure OR, unsourced and unsourceable. "Natural mechanics" is an invention of the creator of the article. Looie496 (talk) 22:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: BLATANT WP:OR, totally unsourced, no assertion of notability. TallNapoleon (talk) 23:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

This article published by title: phrase knowledge/ ISBN:964-06-0632-4

My calculation and the result is actual. Everyone can examine it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali Vaseghi (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Totally bonkers. If not then way above WP's level and needs to be sent to math or science publication. Redddogg (talk) 00:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: original research of author. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 01:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:OR, though truly special in its attempt to best Time Cube in the lunacy stakes. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:OR. - TexasAndroid (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment There's no need to be insulting, folks. Looie496 (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:OR.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 09:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.