Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural habitat of most of the snakes of Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 04:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Natural habitat of most of the snakes of Australia
Delete as it is simply generic information with no encyclopedic value. Gay Cdn 13:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You could certainly write a good article on Snakes in Australia or Australian snakes. Alas, this isn't it and it isn't a catchy title that people would look for information on. Delete. Capitalistroadster 21:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 21:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Badly titled. Content already sufficiently covered elsewhere. - Longhair 21:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Where is this content already covered? I would like to know for reference sake, since both of Capitalistroadster's links are red right now and they would be where I would go first. I would say move and expand under one of the suggested titles above unless the information is expanded upon somewhere else. Ans e ll  23:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * There does not appear to be an article on Australian snakes - see the Category:Reptiles of Australia which I have added to the article. There should be and this should be deleted. --Bduke 23:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Snakes of Australia and expand -- Chuq 00:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete--Peta 06:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Why? Ans e ll 22:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete content is already covered in individual snake articles, such as Black Headed Python, Spotted python, Eastern brown snake, and Taipan. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you think the content would be appropriate on a Snakes in Australia or similar page? Ans e ll  22:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I think such a page would be appropriate but not with the content as it is on the current page. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 07:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Snakes of Australia and allow organic growth —Pengo 12:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Snakes of Australia, I agree with above Riscy 04:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete a stub at Snakes of Australia would be good, but this isn't it. Eluchil404 07:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete a stub at Snakes of Australia would be good, but this isn't it. Eluchil404 07:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.