Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural hairstyle

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 09:07, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Natural hairstyle
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Pointless. Deb 12:53, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. utcursch 12:57, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Provides no added info besides title. Speedy. Mgm|(talk) 13:55, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Gotta love those circular definitions. Nevertheless, Delete. Radiant! 14:02, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can also see a good case for a speedy delete. Carrp | Talk 14:05, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A deletable article is the article that one naturally deletes. Naturally, I vote to delete this deletable article. Trilobite (Talk) 15:17, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Naturally. HyperZonk 17:12, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete #2 or 4, user test with little or no (i.e. brief and circular) content. Wyss 19:04, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, circular dictionary definition. Megan1967 05:06, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Maybe redirect to Afro? Circa 1970, an "afro" was equally known as a "natural" -- Jmabel | Talk 08:17, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * My natural hairstyle isn't an "afro", so no redirect please. Megan1967 07:26, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks like a speedy delete candidate under several categories, but a redirect to Afro certainly wouldn't hurt. It almost looks like an attempt at a redirect anyway. - Lucky 6.9 18:11, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)