Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural responsibility


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedily deleted as an article without context and sources. (aeropagitica) 23:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Natural responsibility


This article has been tagged as disputed since it's fourth edit. It remains unsourced. My own google search turned up no uses of the phrase in the manner described in this page. From the available evidence, this appears to be original research. Rossami (talk) 06:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC) November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:OR. Rambeling nonsense, not much else to say about it. MartinDK 07:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Nonsense unverifiable and original research.  Spinach Dip 09:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: pubphilosophycruft. Cheers, Sam Clark 15:29, 14
 * Speedy Delete: Nonsense. Mrbowtie 21:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.