Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature Food


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nature Research. Not much content to merge, and no one has explained why this journal should be mentioned in Nature Research when they have over a hundred journals. Should a list of Nature Research journals be created, the redirect should be updated. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 10:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Nature Food

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge. While we may not need articles for every academic journal, it's particularly valuable for Wikipedia to have articles about the reliable sources we use in the project, and Nature journals tend accrue above-average prestige. Either merge into Nature Publishing Group, or create a List of Nature Research academic journals to aggregate the data in table form. Pburka (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Complete fail of WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. Article creation way WP:TOOSOON. Merging into the NPG article is undesirable, we cannot merge every journal there. At this point, basically the only information available is the title and perhaps its ISSN. WP is not here to help NPG to advertise their new journals. --Randykitty (talk) 18:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:NJournals says "If the journal can be considered a reliable source, this will be often be sufficient to create a stub on a particular journal." Stubs or lists of reliable sources are particularly useful, as they aid us in maintaining the encyclopedia itself. Pburka (talk) 16:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * That part presumes the journal is notable to begin with. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:41, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to NPG, or create a list of NPG publications, per Pburka. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Nature Publishing Group. KartikeyaS  (talk) 07:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.