Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature Podcast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect and merge. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Nature Podcast

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

article does not establish why this podcast is notable. Tagged for 1 year with references concerns, still contains zero 3rd party references Rtphokie (talk) 12:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nature (journal), with a possible merge. A one-line mention of the podcast at Nature (journal) probably wouldn't hurt anything -- but on the other hand, I have not been able to come up with any independent WP:RSes that mention the podcast, so the citation in the main article would still just be a primary source citation (I did hit one blog that talked about it, FWIW).  In any case, redirecting is a no brainer; whether to also merge, meh, I guess I'm neutral. --Jaysweet (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no reason to have a separate article from parent User529 (talk) 23:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a no-brainer merge & redirect. Keep the info, but place it in the parent article on the journal. Sourcing for whatever is merged can be direct primary sources found on the Nature website as it needn't require secondary sourcing to be relevant. (It's a pretty good podcast, too.) &mdash; Scientizzle 16:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.