Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naturism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep, bad-faith disruptive nom. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Naturism

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article contravenes Wikipedia guidelines on content policy. As confirmation, all editing to make the article more objective have been consistently deleted or 'vandalised' RevRoland (talk) 14:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * clearly not. Article is 96K long, and has grown bo 2k this year, so is being updated/ improved and not "constanly deleted". I see the Rev also wants to delete masturbation. Am I seeing an agenda? IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * clearly not:RevRoland has only made two edits to the article both of which were unreferenced POVs. They were reverted. In March 2010 he added "Modern naturism is often associated with 'swinging' or sexual promiscuity, and some naturist magazines cater for this. Naturism may be seen in traditional terms as a form of natural witchcraft where no formally laid out ceremonies are involved." And in September he had another swipe. Then again he comes out of nowhere with a AfD. I have 'watched' this page since I did the major rewrite some years back, and all serious suggestions have be taken to the talk page and integrated someway. This is the first time that vandalism has taken the form of a malicious AfD (edit conflict)--ClemRutter (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep: See nominator's recent AFD. Lost on Belmont (talk) 14:46, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Well-referenced article about encyclopedic subject. --bonadea contributions talk 14:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.