Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navanandi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Navanandi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A random list of photos and directions to temples without any references or claims to notability. The article was deleted on a PROD because of WP:NOT, and then recreated identically, which I'll take as a belated objection to the PROD. As it is, it is a FORK from the identical section in Nandyal (an article with a different set of problems). I am skeptical on the question of whether there is notability or a potential article here (only 111 ghits), but an editor wanting to create a Navanandi article would have to dump this one and start from scratch anyway; there's not even anything to reduce to a stub. THF (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, the article provides absolutely no context (WP:NOT does seem to apply), and as stated above the article in question contains the exact same content as found in the Nandyal article. --Aka042 (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- Abecedare (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   -- Abecedare (talk) 18:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability, no reliable sources... Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 23:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article appears to be primarily used as an image gallery. -- Whpq (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.