Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navarro W. Gray


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Navarro W. Gray

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deceptively well-sourced article. However, upon closer inspection, none of the sources is an in-depth discussion of Gray. Instead, we have a number of in-passing mentions in local outlets (possible not all reliable sources) connected to him being a public defender in some minor cases. In short, what would be expected for any small-time lawyer. His representation of Fetty Wap does not seem to have generated any significant coverage either. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete nominator nailed it. Jytdog (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. The coverage concerning Fetty Wap just mentions him as the lawyer. I do not see any other national/international coverage about him either. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 23:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. non notable. "Having represented means very little unless the cases were exceptionally notable.  Pure promotionalism.  DGG ( talk ) 03:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing actually containing anything for the applicable solid independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.