Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navea Training Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Hīt. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  essay  // 04:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Navea Training Center

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article on a training center in Iraq has no sources. After searching I found two reliable sources--one in CNN and one a DoD press release (.  Both mention the base only in passing.  This seems to be just one of many US bases in Iraq part of the Iraq War, which has no particular claim to notability.  Without WP:RS, this does not appear to meet WP:GNG.   Qwyrxian (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to United States military in Iraq or Hīt (last week I might have said "merge to Hīt during the Iraq War", but its AfD just closed as a "merge"). Doesn't seem to be any real sources to establish independant notability (though I know that Camp Hit was a fairly significant Marine base in Anbar), which is a shame, but typical of US bases in Iraq.  bahamut0013  words deeds 20:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect - Any useful, cited information from reliable sources can be merged intot he article Hīt forming its own section within the article. If the section expands sufficiently with more referenced content then it can always be split and the article in question can be recreated. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 12:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Bahamut0013. Anotherclown (talk) 09:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.