Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naved Ahmed (Lahore cricketer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Lahore Whites. While there are a couple of keep arguments, they did not refute the assertion that the article fails the GNG. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Naved Ahmed (Lahore cricketer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in coverage. Störm  (talk)  20:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Keep - the article clearly needs improvement, and to take out all of the Cricket Archive links. However, the article also clearly passes WP:CRIN by virtue of Naved having played in three List A matches. As usual for cricketers, WP:GNG is not the relevant standard. DevaCat1 (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Lahore List-A cricketers or similar Has played 3 List-A matches, but probably meets the threshold to be deleted using similar precedent to WP:FOOTY use for footballers with just a couple of games. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep played in three LA matches, meeting WP:NCRIC.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 13:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete none of the sources provide the significant coverage which is needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)