Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navicat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- jonny - m t  02:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

navicat
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was created by the company who develop this software. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not for marketing purposes... Frap (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Blatant adspam. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Every one can post wiki to let public to gain more knowledge. If that wiki will be deleted, then all other wiki should also be deleted. The lost is just for public?


 * Also-delete-them? Example:
 * Mysql
 * Phpmyadmin
 * Sqlyog
 * Microsoft_Access
 * HeidiSQL


 * So, I think we should keep all of them including Navicat. - Kenneth. Lv.heaven ( t / c )  — Lv.heaven (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Difference is that those articles where created by independent people who thought they were worthy for inclusion. navicat article was created by the developers of the software to free advertisement here to sell their shareware product. You cant be serious to to claim we should delete Microsoft Access which is done by worlds biggest software company and compare it to navicat who nobody heard of. -- Frap (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. The Google News results might help determining the notability. utcursch | talk 04:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I previously removed the spam from this article (it was very spammy) and reduced it to a decent enough stub, if lacking in third party sources to prove notability. In its current state, keep - especially considering the number of sources Utcursch's search shows up. ➨ REDVEЯS paints a vulgar picture 08:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep This article is just like other common free software article. I think it's not commercial content. I found lots of similar software product articles from wiki site that no one will suggest to delete. I feel strange. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.73.23.137 (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Those articles weren't created by their developers. This guy obviously puts his shareware software article here, so it can help him sell his software. -- Frap (talk) 02:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep  - I am a new Navicat user and find this Navicat wiki article from google. It's a notable software and I am suprised that someone tries to attack and delete this article. The article is natural and I find no reason to delete it from wiki. There's no strong point at all. User: chli168  —Preceding comment was added at 02:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep ChangLimbang (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.