Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navid Khiabani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G10 — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Navid Khiabani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

weak WP:RS to say the least. I have WP:BLP concerns about the low quality sourcing and the one unverified telegraph report that mentions him (apparently they stated they had no verification of the story). I searched the web and I found almost nothing about this person. The biography in my opinion is coming over as a weakly verified attack about a living person. Govindaharihari (talk) 16:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

The telegraph article doesn't even appear to have a mention of him or his company - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1542559/Iraqi-insurgents-using-Austrian-rifles-from-Iran.html - Also please note that one of the two creators and spa accounts that have created this biography is replacing unsupported personal claims about the subject of bio after I removed it as without a WP:RS. Looking over this users contributions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Remot_sam in my opinion there is an element of a competence issue or attack page creation in the contributions to this article. Govindaharihari (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under G10. GregJackP   Boomer!   21:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.