Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navid Ostadian-Binai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Navid Ostadian-Binai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks and reads like a resumé of a non-notable person trying to blend in so nobody notices. There are no references about him, just profiles; the article's creator tried unsuccessfully to create an article about the spouse, so it's possible it's an autobiography.  K rakatoa    K atie   04:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I really cannot see anything notiable in this article. Even his "angel" investment cannot be correctly described: angels are not people who invest in their own company.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 18:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Despite the plethora of green links in the footnotes, I am not seeing substantial coverage of this subject in independently published sources, and thus a failure to meet GNG. I don't doubt that there is a possibility that such sources may emerge over time and that this may well be a TOOSOON situation. Delete without bias to future recreation should such sources appear. Carrite (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.